Friday, August 31, 2012


It’s the culture, stupid

[Ed. Note:  Yes, It is a culture war.  We will see more pronounced details about this war between conservatives/modernist thinkers and post-modern thinkers as the Obama camp takes over the TV air waves next week.  We vote based on what we believe.  But, constant exposure erodes just as rain erodes a hillside.  That's where Hollywood takes control.  Good read for a Labor Day weekend.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

Blogs : John Stonestreet

http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/its-the-culture-stupid?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com+Daily+

by John Stonestreet  for Breakpoint.org, (linked below)
  • Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:41 EST
When Hillary Clinton claimed there was a “vast right-wing conspiracy” against her husband, many conservatives just laughed. “Work together?” many of us thought. “She apparently doesn’t know conservatives as well as she thinks she does.”

But Jonathan Chait, writing last week in the left-leaning New York magazine claims there’s actually a vast left-wing conspiracy, but this conspiracy isn’t located in Washington, D.C. This conspiracy, Chait argues, comes from Hollywood, which is “mainly transmitting an ethos in which greed is not only bad but the main wellspring of evil, authority figures of all kinds are often untrustworthy, sexual freedom is absolute, and social equality of all kinds is paramount.”

Chait goes on: “You don’t have to be an especially devoted consumer of film or television to detect a pervasive, if not total, liberalism.” He then points to “the modern family in Modern Family, not to mention the girls of Girls and the gays of Glee…” as evidence.

In the end, Chait concludes that “the uncomfortable reality is that the culture war is an ongoing liberal rout. Hollywood is as liberal as ever, and conservatives have simply despaired of changing it.”

This is something that all Christians concerned with the state of our culture must hear and learn. We have tended to see the culture wars as being primarily a battle of ideas, which almost exclusively takes place in the political sphere. But as we often say here on BreakPoint, politics is downstream from culture. Politics is most often a reflection of cultural values, not a source of them.

This is precisely why social liberals have been so successful in re-defining cultural values. They see the battle of ideas as a battle for the imagination that takes place in all cultural spheres, especially the arts. As Rod Dreher said in response to Chait’s observations, “The Right only knows how to make arguments; the Left knows how to make art.”

Now, these articles are primarily critiquing political and philosophical conservatives, but they just as easily could apply to Christians. We’ve almost exclusively limited our cultural engagement to the level of critique. We’ve locked in on ideas, while secularism has captured the imagination of our culture by retelling our stories.
Being able to identify the ideas at the root of culture is critical, but our failure to engage and produce cultural artifacts in the arts and sciences reveals a huge blind spot. Cultural change requires more than ideas, it requires the production of cultural goods.

Our Christian forebears understood this better than we do now. Christians created cultural goods embedded with a Christian understanding of God, man, and the world. This happened in cultural areas as diverse as music and healthcare, architecture and education, arts and the sciences, exploration and government.

The Christian fear and flight from culture in our day has led to a marginalization of faith in public life and an inability to capture the imaginations of people with the compelling vision for life that is offered in the Gospel.
That’s why I’ve dedicated a four-part series on the “Two-Minute Warning” to talk about culture. Last week I examined the proper posture Christians should have toward culture, and this week I define clearly what culture is (and what it is not). This would be a great series to watch and discuss in your small groups and church education classes. Come to BreakPoint.org, click on this commentary, and we’ll link you to this “Two-Minute Warning” series.

Let’s tackle this. Let’s figure out how we might begin reclaiming the cultural imagination through a re-engagement with various areas that shape our culture. We might find the political and legal battles much easier to handle if we do.

Reprinted from Breakpoint.

The Bishop's "Reverse Marriage"

The Bishop's "Reverse Marriage"

By Trey Dimsdale, J.D.
http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/08/28/the-bishops-reverse-marriage-2/
August 28th, 2012

The Rt. Rev. Gene Robinson, Episcopal Bishop of the Diocese of New Hampshire and I had the privilege of traveling to San Diego, CA last month to attend the Ruth Institute's It Takes a Family to Raise a Village Conference. The conference is targeted at college-aged students and provides them the opportunity to learn from and interact with very notable scholars who work in the field of marriage and family in their respective disciplines. Speakers included economists, attorneys, activists, a medical doctor, and theologians all presenting persuasive arguments in support of natural, man/woman marriage. I wish a similar program had been available when I was a college student and even more, I hope that if it had, I would have had the wisdom to avail myself of it.


Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Who knew? Mitt Romney, Bain Capital and the Episcopal Church Pension Fund

In accepting the Republican presidential nomination, Mitt Romney said:
So we started a new business called Bain Capital. The only problem was, while WE believed in ourselves, nobody else did. We were young and had never done this before and we almost didn’t get off the ground. In those days, sometimes I wondered if I had made a really big mistake. I had thought about asking my church’s pension fund to invest, but I didn't. I figured it was bad enough that I might lose my investors’ money, but I didn’t want to go to hell too. Shows what I know. Another of my partners got the Episcopal Church pension fund to invest. Today there are a lot of happy retired priests who should thank him.
Whereupon Diana Butler Bass tweeted: Episcopal Church Pension Fund: Divest from Bain Capital.

And Elizabeth Drescher tweeted: #TEC is Bain investor. How quickly can we divest?

And John Chilton tweeted: @edrescherphd Why should we?

And Ginny Baker Gibbs tweeted: I'm an Episcopalian and I'm wondering how long until Jim Naughton puts up a post about the Church Pension Fund.

AnglicanTV: Interview with Archbishop Duncan

Insightful interview from Kevin Kallsen and AnglicanTV with the Archbishop of the Anglican Church in North America Bob Duncan focuses on the crisis in the Anglican Mission in America (AMiA) and its affect nationally and on the Anglican Communion.

Popout

Swimming the Great Salt Lake: The TEC-LDS divide

Swimming the Great Salt Lake: The TEC-LDS divide
Ann Romney was Episcopalian and Bishop Carolyn Tanner Irish was Mormon

By Mary Ann Mueller
Special Correspondent
www.virtueonline.org
Aug. 30, 2012

Tuesday night, Ann Romney uttered four small words, buried deep within her 20-minute address at the Republican National Convention that gave the world an insight into her religious background.

"I was an Episcopalian," the Republican presidential candidate's wife revealed about her lackadaisical religious upbringing.

It is reported that a young Mitt Romney first saw Ann Davies, the daughter of the mayor of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, while both were in elementary school. Several years later, they officially met at a friend's party. By then, the youngest sibling Romney was the governor's son. Their first date came while both were in high school. The future businessman and politician proposed to his high school sweetheart at his senior prom.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

INDIANAPOLIS: The Inauguration of the Missionary Diocese of the Trinity

INDIANAPOLIS: The Inauguration of the Missionary Diocese of the Trinity
"A landmark inauguration," says Primate of all Nigeria, The Most Rev. Dr. Nicholas D. Okoh

http://www.anglicanchurch.net/?/main/page/503
August 29, 2012

On Sunday, August 19, 2012, The Most Rev. Dr. Nicholas Okoh, Primate of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), and The Most Rev. Robert Duncan, Primate of the Anglican Church in North America, accompanied by three other Nigerian archbishops, The Most Rev. Olu Akinyemi, The Most Rev. Ikechi Nwosu and The Most Rev. Ignatius Kattey and nine other bishops made history at the inauguration a new diocese in North America, The Missionary Diocese of the Trinity.

The duly elected and consecrated Bishop of the Diocese, The Rt. Rev. Amos Akinseye Fagbamiye, was also enthroned at the Anglican Cathedral Church of the Resurrection in Indianapolis, IN as the first bishop of the Diocese.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Romney Will Enforce Obscenity Laws

Romney Will Enforce Obscenity Laws

By Mike McManus
August 30, 2012

One change in the Republican Party Platform this year over previous years is very important to American families.

Past Republican platforms only opposed child pornography. The new platform adopted this week states: "Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced."

Believe it or not, "Current federal obscenity laws not only prohibit distribution of hardcore pornography on the Internet, but also on hotel/motel TV, on cable/satellite TV and in retail shops." asserts Patrick Trueman, president of Morality in Media.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Thursday, August 30, 2012


DO NOT BE ALARMED

Rowan Williams seems to have developed the ability to make other people as incoherent as he is.  I have absolutely no idea what Theo Hobson is yammering on about here:

Despite his theological brilliance, Rowan Williams’ approach to the place of religion in society has been deeply flawed. In my opinion, it is this that has marred his leadership of the Church of England. I am reluctant to say this, for I greatly admire his thought, particularly his insight into the sacramental essence of Christianity. I paid close attention to his utterances as archbishop. I wrote quite a few articles on him, and even a short book about his ecclesiology. I do not expect to pay his successor such attention. I feel I ought to express gratitude that such a serious thinker has led the church this past decade. But it needs to be said: I do not think that he has been good for the Church of England. I consider him a brilliant, but flawed, theologian. And I think that the past decade has brought out his flawed side, given it great exposure, influence. I am talking about his deeply ideological view of liberalism.

Why is that, T?

To put it bluntly, he has a very low opinion of the liberal state. This is influenced by various things: the Marxist critique of liberalism as a veneer for capitalism, the communitarian idea (associated with Alasdair MacIntyre and others) that liberal values are weak, thin, illusory, and most obviously his deep preference for Catholicism and Orthodoxy over Protestantism. These factors led him to see liberalism as an essentially secular ideology that wants to “privatise” religion, push it from “the public square”. (It was ironic that the press dubbed him a liberal on account of his relative sympathy with gay rights and his leftwing politics, because he represented a militantly “post-liberal” form of theology.)

And that’s bad?

Williams’s anti-liberal tendency was exacerbated by 9/11, and the sudden arrival of a religious-based culture war in Britain. Instead of reassuring Britons that religion and liberalism were compatible, he did the opposite: painted liberalism as the enemy of “faith communities”, and dismissed liberal fears that an expanding faith school sector might damage social cohesion. The real danger, he said, was not religion seeking a larger role in society (including the partial introduction of sharia law) but the secular liberal “agenda”, driven by soulless capitalism, and arrogant atheism. He presented the role of the established church as to defend all forms of religion from the threat of bullying secularism.

According to Theo, religion is fine as long as it does what the state needs for it to do.  Or something along those lines.  Maybe.

What is the liberal state? It is, I suggest, the state that has moved away from theocratic religion (or secular totalitarianism), and that finds a new narrative of national identity in “liberty”. This move entails limiting some forms of religious expression, forms that retain theocratic impulses. The liberal state therefore insists that not all religion can be allowed full expression in “the public square”. Of course there is a danger of a new authoritarianism, in the name of “liberty”. But the liberal state can learn to mitigate this. Above all, this is the least worst form of religious politics. Recent thinkers, both religious and secular, are guilty of failing to renew this narrative; they think they are cleverly postmodern by denigrating it.

It’s right about here where Hobsie loses me.

What is ironic about Williams’s denigration of this narrative is that the national church has played a key role in it. Its establishment is a strangely ambiguous phenomenon. It is rooted in an early form of liberalism: a national church was the way to ward off Catholic theocracy and become a free modern nation. But of course establishment was inhibitive of full religious liberty. The establishment is therefore fraught with contradictory meanings.

Whatever you say, Theo.

For all his famous intellect, Williams has not helped us to reflect on this rich and strange tradition. A national religious leader should open up the discussion about religion and liberalism, encourage new honesty, in church and nation, about its complexity. Instead, Williams pushed his excessively ideological view of the matter. His legacy seems clear. He has strengthened the hand of more conventional conservatives like John Sentamu, his likely successor (gulp). And he has left liberal Anglicanism in a more demoralised state than ever – which might be good for it, might force it to ask what it is for.

So.  Rowan Williams is a Christian liberal who’s actually a Christian conservative because he…ah, screw it.  Haven’t got the time and I officially and finally lost interest a year or so ago.  Since I’m so incredibly awesome at discovering fundamental laws of the universe, let me propose another one.  If people routinely respond to whatever you say or write with, “I think what _______ means here is..,” your communication skills suck.

‘Why Church?’

[Ed. Note:  Every mainline shows decreasing attendance figures, even the Southern Baptist Convention.  Church has been dismissed as a part of a normal adult/family life.  Every denomination is trying to deal with this resistance.  This is an idea that will work in communities with a close-knit group of churches whose pastors respect each other.  Worth the read.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://www.lincolndailynews.com/News/today082812_ch.shtml

By Ron Otto for the Lincoln (IL) Daily News

August 28, 2012
At first, it sounds like the beginning of a bad joke: “What do a Baptist, a Lutheran, a Pentecostal and an Episcopal minister all have in common?”Well, this is no joke. In September, what these ministers have in common will be their sermons.

In a most unprecedented approach, several area church pastors will join in presenting a series of sermons titled “Why Church?” The pastors are meeting weekly and sharing in the writing and planning of each sermon.
I question if any community can ever remember a time when preachers from different denominations and backgrounds worked together on their sermons to preach a series of joint-effort messages. These sermons will not be “Why MY church?” but “Why THE church?”

“Why Church?” is being presented due to the ever-growing attack on the Christian church. The mudslinging that has taken place over the last few years against the church demands a response from its leaders as to why the church is important. We’re going to answer that question together.

We will be inviting the entire community to find their way into one of the churches presenting the series and to give us a sincere and open ear as to why the church is needed in Lincoln, Ill. Over the next month, you will be hearing from many church and civic leaders as to why they appreciate the church in Lincoln.

To help in ringing the bell, these churches will hand out bookmark invitations. For the entire month, the people from these congregations will wear bracelets and fly yard signs that read “Why Church?”

Residents will also be able to get pertinent information on a newly created website: www.whychurch.net.
There is still time for other churches to join. Just contact one of the ministers already involved.

Why not accept one of these invitations and try a church in the month of September? You just might hear what your heart has been longing for.

CHENNAI, INDIA: Hindu nationalists attack Anglicans in Tamil Nadu, one dead

CHENNAI, INDIA: Hindu nationalists attack Anglicans in Tamil Nadu, one dead
Violence comes to Sasthancode and Nadaikavu, Kanyakumari District

by Nirmala Carvalho
ASIA NEWS
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Hindu-nationalists-attack-Anglicans-in-Tamil-Nadu,-one-dead-25659.html
Aug. 28, 2012

Members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu nationalist organisation, have been relentlessly attacking Christians in Kanyakumari District (Tamil Nadu). On Sunday, a man was killed and two more suffered serious injuries to the head. All three belonged to the (Anglican) Church of South India (CSI) in the village of Nadaikavu. Police filed a first information report against Dharmaraj, head of the local Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a Hindu nationalist party, and six other men. Fearing more violence, they deployed an additional 1,000 agents to patrol the area.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

pecusa brilliance strikes again


CONNECTICUT: Bishop Inherits the Whirlwind of an Empty Bishop Seabury Parish

CONNECTICUT: Bishop Inherits the Whirlwind of an Empty Bishop Seabury Parish

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
August 29, 2012

He got an empty building for his legal troubles and a hefty legal bill to go with it. Not a single soul has stayed with the Bishop Seabury parish, the Diocese of Connecticut or its ultra-liberal Bishop Ian Douglas. A strong, active, vibrant evangelical church used the building to raise holy hands to God. The Gospel was being preached and the Sacraments were being celebrated. But that wasn't good enough. A deal could not be cut, so the bishop got the building.

Now Bishop Douglas has an empty church; he does not know what to do with it. Who is the winner here, asks Fr. Ron Gauss. PA Bishop Charles Bennison let it drop recently that it can cost $55,000 and up just to maintain an empty church...and he has nine of them.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Wednesday, August 29, 2012


Look Not to The Episcopal Church - Phil Ashey

Look Not to The Episcopal Church

By Canon Phil Ashey
The following is from the August 28 edition of the AAC's International Update
http://www.americananglican.org/
August 28, 2012

I recently read an article by Dr. Michael Poon in The Living Church (August 26, 2012), "Look Beyond England." Dr. Poon, director of the Centre for the Study of Christianity in Asia (Singapore), has been a frequent critic of "post-Western colonialism"-especially those quarrels and disputes "exported and internationalized" by British and American (read "Western") Anglicans upon "institutionally weak" Anglican churches particularly in the Global South.

I was therefore astonished by his conclusion: "For me, as those in the Oxford Movement once saw, the disestablished American Episcopal Church, holding out the vision of a catholic and missionary church, offers a more promising future of spiritual renewal for the Anglican world.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Liberal diversity


DNC Turns Down RC Cardinal Request to Pray at Convention but Yes to 2 hour Islamic Jumah Prayers


HUCK FIN

I’m a Protestant.  And I guess I favor the Baptist approach to things more than the Anglican one because I prefer my Christian worship to be simple, direct and unadorned.  Toward the end of my run with the Episcopalians, the Anglo-Catholic pomp and circumstance at my joint really began to annoy me so, except for Christmas and Easter, I completely abandoned it in favor of this low-church thing we did in a small, side chapel.

Spend the first 48 years of your life inside a particular tradition and leaving it is the hardest thing in the world so I keep telling myself that I’m going to die as some kind of Anglican or other.  But I really think that I’m probably going to end up as a Southern Baptist or as a member of some other church with a similar, low-church style of worship.

For one thing, the sermons are better.  But that’s not saying much.  Not many traditions don’t preach better than the Episcopalians, Catholics included.  And I read Charles Spurgeon all the time so maybe I’m setting the bar awfully high.

I just wish that some Southern Baptists would stop embarrassing me.  Take Mike Huckabee.  The former Baptist pastor and later governor of Arkansas used to be someone I would have enthusiastically backed for president. Not anymore:

Mike Huckabee rallied hundreds of Southern Baptists on a conference call Friday night in support of Todd Akin, offering advice about how they can help the embattled Missouri Senate candidate stay in the race — while acknowledging Akin still may have to bow out.
“This could be a Mount Carmel moment,” said the former Arkansas governor, referring to the holy battle between Elijah and the prophets of Baal in the book of Kings. “You know, you bring your gods. We’ll bring ours. We’ll see whose God answers the prayers and brings fire from heaven. That’s kind of where I’m praying: that there will be fire from heaven, and we’ll see it clearly, and everyone else will to.”

Head, Keyboard, you know the drill.  Just call me QWERTY Face.  WONderful idea, Huck.  Compare a true prophet of the living God to an arrogant, self-centered, opportunistic six-term Missouri congressman who can’t get out of his own way but thinks he’s entitled to the nomination simply because a tiny percentage of Missourians tapped the touch screen for him.  If that doesn’t convince people, I don’t know what will.  David Barton, one of the people Huck called in for this conference of his, doubled down.

“There’s been a lot of political leaders who have made major gaffes but not just misspoken,” said Barton. “One of the greatest leaders in Israel’s history was David, who had [committed] adultery, murdered Uriah, etc. But he repented. God gave him forgiveness. Great leader. But that was not a misspeaking of words. And then Noah had trouble with drunkenness. God still used him. Samuel couldn’t control his children. He ran a nation. Moses, guilty of murder. He came back, delivers a nation.”

Go on sinning that grace might increase, Dave?  Once again, we’re talking about one inept Missouri congressman here, not one of the Apostles.  And believe me, it’s not like Missouri Republicans are shunning the next Abraham Lincoln.  Oh, and Huck?  If you want to take the Christian approach to this controversy, it seems like it would be a pretty good idea to steer clear of lying through your teeth.

Huckabee said he received calls from the highest levels of the Republican Party after he came out in support of Akin, who came under fire Sunday after his “legitimate rape” remarks. But Huckabee suggested the GOP establishment has begun to realize that Akin may wind up being their only hope.
“Today, the rhetoric was dramatically dialed back,” he said. “You did not see the NRSC, the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee, coming out with the kind of harsh statements because they’ve dialed it back. They’ve assured me that they will no longer be threatening the business of some of the vendors in politics and telling them that if they do anything to help Todd, they’d be blackballed and not get any business.

“That kind of stuff’s been going on, and I told these people yesterday that I talked to: That’s got to stop. It can’t continue. That’s what union goons do: breaking people’s kneecaps when you cross a line. And Todd Akin has done nothing but make a mistake for which he has roundly repudiated the comment and apologized. There’s nothing else he can do.” 

The NRSC pushed back firmly on Huckabee’s accusation.

“We have a great deal of respect for Gov. Huckabee and regret that we do not see eye to eye with him on this race,” said NRSC Communications Director Brian Walsh. “It’s important to set the record straight, though, that the types of tactics he describes simply did not happen — and further, no one at the NRSC has even spoken with the governor this week.”

Huckabee released a statement Saturday walking back the comments he made on the call.
“I have not had any direct contact with leaders or staff from the NRSC,” he said in the emailed statement. “This is an attempt to create a story. My comments this week on my own forums of radio and to the people who choose to receive communications from me are first hand and accurately reflect what I said. I hardly need third-party news outlets who ‘heard’ things to report on that which simply didn’t happen. Harry Reid has imaginary friends who tell him things about others, and it appears that there are some others in the media who have some imaginary friends.”

Ah, the famous reductio ad infantum argument, popularly known as “I’m rubber and you’re glue, etc.”  Dave Weigel reports that if Huck ever wants to take another run at high political office, he’s got a “magic uterus” problem of his own which, amazingly, he handled even worse than Akin handled his.

But Huckabee’s been at this rodeo — do pilgrims rodeo? — at this clam bake for quite some time. In 1998, Arkansas State Senator Fay Boozman helped wreck his chances at a U.S. Senate seat by suggesting that rape-activated female hormones could prevent pregnancy — “God’s little shield.”
Boozman lost by 12 points. Then he lucked out. Gov. Mike Huckabee, a friend and political ally for many years, put Boozman in charge of the Arkansas Department of Health. The “God’s little shield” controversy was fresh, and Huckabee kept getting asked about it. As far as he was concerned, the story was over, and it was unfair to harp on it. “If nothing else,” said Huckabee, according to a February 1999 story in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, “I hope to make it very clear that our administration is not governed by intimidation. We’re not going to allow the shrill voices of a few to so disparage the character of a very decent and good person to an outstanding position in such a way that Arkansas would lose his service at the Department of Health.”

Look.  I’m certain that Todd Akin is a wonderful person who just picked the wrong words to answer an interviewer.  Those things happen.  But fairly or unfairly, Huck, the simple fact of the matter is that Akin’s words and, more importantly, his words and actions since then have badly hurt the GOP and turned an easy Republican senatorial pick-up into a probable Democratic senatorial retention.

There were two other conservatives in the Missouri primary, Sarah Steelman and John Brunner, who are just as pro-life as Akin is and haven’t made complete fools of themselves in public for a couple of months.  So for you to turn support for Akin, by far the weakest candidate of the three, into some kind of religious litmus test is more than a little offensive to me, Huck, and I share your views on most issues.

Your loyalty to your friends is admirable, Huck, and in an ideal world, Akin’s apology would have sufficed, he’d still lead the execrable McCaskill and one of his aides would be in Washington as I type this, lining up his living arrangements and office space.  But we don’t live in an ideal world, Huck.

Because if we did, Akin understands the damage he had, however inadvertently, done to his party and to the causes he says he supports and withdraws from the race.  Instead, this clueless dolt thinks that winning 36% of 200,000 votes entitles him to remain the Republican nominee, regardless of how his candidacy affects the party here in Missouri and elsewhere across the country.

Huck, you and Akin make much of the fact that you’re independent of the “Republican establishment” and how the “party bosses” don’t much care for either of you.  So you have no right to complain about how the “Republican establishment” is reluctant to fly to your aid now.  If the two of you don’t like them, they probably don’t like the two of you.

Why not?  If you get the time, Huck, look up the meaning of the term “team player.”

Tim Keller—Why Conversion and Revival are Biblical

As I sat looking at my computer screen at the title I’d written for this article, I was somewhat bemused by the fact that a defense of conversion and revival was even necessary. But so it is. There are quarters of the church now questioning whether or not conversion, the new birth, giving oneself to Christ, etc., are topics that should even be raised. Conversion, and its corporate expression, revival, are thought to be manifestations of Western individualistic thinking. Better simply to call people to join the life of the Body of Christ by inviting them to be baptized and share in the community of believers.

While certainly acknowledging the taint of individualism which has infected the modern church, it seems to me undeniable that the scriptures have always used the language of “both…and” rather than “either...or” as regards individual conversion, revival and community life.

Just as a reminder to myself, I went through some key passages regarding this topic. I want to share them with you as a “pastoral preventative,” lest anyone lead you astray on this subject. Good writers and preachers, who I respect when they speak on other subjects such as the resurrection, have, I believe, taken a wrong turning in pitting corporate Body Life against revival and conversion.

Read it all.

RE: Appointment of a new Archbishop of Canterbury

RE: Appointment of a new Archbishop of Canterbury

FROM: The Global South of the Anglican Communion Secretariat:
37 St Paul Road, Vacoas, Mauritius
http://www.globalsouthanglican.org/

TO: The Rt Hon the Lord Luce KG, GCVO Chairman,
Crown Nominations Commission
20 July 2012

The Global South of the Anglican Communion, comprising more than fifty-five million of the eighty million members of the Anglican Communion, deeply appreciate our historical relation with the See of Canterbury. We therefore commend the following to the Crown Nominations Commission for your serious consideration.

It is the reality of the Anglican Communion in the 21st Century that the majority of Anglicans are found within the Global South, especially in Africa. Resulting from the faithful witness of Western missionaries over the past two hundred years, Anglicans today stand in worship and witness amidst diverse cultures, among ancient traditions and often in inter-religious tensions.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

From SermonCentral.com


3 Reasons Pastors Don't Connect with Millennials

8/28/2012

Can your preaching reach the up-and-coming generations? Tyler Braun points out the most common barriers.
A few troubling studies have been released in the recent weeks depicting the ongoing decline of faith among Millennials in America. While the lack of church attendance and the growth of atheism in the Millennial generation have been widely discussed for some time, the bad news about the lack of faith in Millennials is that we don’t care enough to make a difference.
Every time I post about Millennials, someone asks me who Millennials are, so let me clarify here. Millennials are typically known to be people born between the years 1980 and 2000, and they will be the largest generation in the United States within a few years.

A Pew survey released earlier in June compared data points between 2007 and 2012. In 2007, 83% of Millennials in the U.S. said they never doubted God’s existence, but that number has now dropped to 68% in 2012. The survey’s report also stated, “People younger than 30 are substantially less likely than older people to say prayer is an important part of their lives.”

Focus on the Family released a report showing Millennials to be the least likely generation to say “religious life” was important to them. Only 43% of Millennials said yes, compared to 59% of Boomers.

A nation once founded upon the backs of Puritans and their values of hard work and love of God has been replaced by a pursuit of individual happiness and dissatisfaction with “organized religion.”

There’s no question these findings are troubling. The lack of faith among Millennials is unlike anything we’ve ever seen before. In the circles I run in, we’re quick to throw blame on my fellow Millennials for being immature and to place the blame on them for why this country is going down in flames.

I’ve yet to see a single person react positively to these (and many other) reports. But I believe placing blame like this is shortsighted.

The studies of these findings highlight three major problems I see:

Standing On The Sidelines

What’s troubling to me is not the statistics and the studies depicting the lack of faith in Millennials. I’ve lived these statistics with almost all of my friends who lack intentional Christian community, church involvement, and consistent disciplines for engaging their so-called relationship with God. The statistics don’t scare me.

What’s troubling to me is how we’re responding to Millennials. Rather than extending a hand, we’re quick to place blame. It’s a lot easier to stand on the sidelines yelling at the refs than it is to put ourselves in the game.

Rather than being an influence, we watch television every night.

Rather than getting involved, we wait for our pastor’s vision to extend to the next generation first. After all, if he or she isn’t on board with this, why should we be?
At some point, we have to acknowledge that the excuses no longer cover up our lack of care for others.

Questions

I’ve yet to meet a single person who didn’t struggle with faith somewhere along the journey of life.

While I’d agree there is a big difference between doubting God’s existence and doubting His good and sovereign will, doubt is a part of the life of faith for all of us at some point.

I’ve seen the movie The Way two times now, and each time I’ve been struck with how much we give the Christian idea of unwavering faith a platform. With this picture of an ideal faith in one hand and our own reality of faith as an unending journey with struggles, doubts, and mistakes in the other hand, it’s no wonder we walk away to somewhere else that meets our needs instead.

The religious environment most of us have come to know is a rules-driven, legalistic, head disconnected from heart, sit up straight and pay attention, religious type of duty.

Disparaging statistics about the faith of Millennials aside, if we’re going to push for a Christian faith that doesn’t encourage the questioning of faith within life, I believe we’re only further alienating people who are searching for a place to share in the struggles and questions of life with others.

Millennials have often known church to be a place where put-together Christians put on their happy faces to fake their way through life. We need church to be a place where we engage the harsh realities of life.

Searching

People are constantly searching for hope, for love, and for someone to genuinely care for them right where they are.

The bad news about the lack of faith among Millennials is that we don’t see it as an opportunity.

I’m not advocating for passing off blame from Millennials. We have much to learn when it comes to navigating faith and life.

I’m just asking that you stop blaming Millennials and start getting to know them.

By engaging others in personal relationships, you’ll change statistics without realizing it.

Don’t throw around survey statistics; extend a hand instead.

Tyler Braun
Tyler lives in Portland. He is married to Rose and attends Multnomah Biblical Seminary. He is the student Ministry Worship and Praise Band Director at Sunset Presbyterian Church.

Hostility to religion in U.S. at ‘all-time high’

[Ed. Note:  With the Republican National Convention opening today in Tampa, this is relevant, both for our private lives and our corporate and church lives. What can you do about it?  You can make sure to inform yourself on local and national issues and VOTE.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=38588

Posted on Aug 27, 2012

by Tom Strode, The Baptist Press Washington, D.C.  Bureau Chief

WASHINGTON (BP) — Hostility toward religious expression “has reached an all-time high” in the United States, according to a new report.

“The Survey of Religious Hostility in America” shows a rising tide of attacks on religious liberty in the public square and in schools as well as against churches and ministries, Liberty Institute (LI) and Family Research Council (FRC) said in the 140-page report. The organizations released the document Aug. 17 and held an Aug. 20 news conference at Tampa, Fla., during the Republican National Convention’s platform committee meeting in that city.

The report, which is an update of a 2004 survey by LI, documents more than 600 instances of hostility toward religion — hostility it says is dramatically growing in both frequency and type. Most have taken place in the last 10 years. Religious liberty advocates have prevailed in legal challenges in some of the incidents, not in others.
“America today would be unrecognizable to our Founders,” said Kelly Shackelford, LI president, and Tony Perkins, FRC president, in the introduction to the survey. “Our first freedom is facing a relentless onslaught from well-funded and aggressive groups and individuals who are using the courts, Congress, and the vast federal bureaucracy to suppress and limit religious freedom. This radicalized minority is driven by an anti-religious ideology that is turning the First Amendment upside down.”

They pointed to the Obama administration’s common use of the term “freedom of worship” instead of “freedom of religion” as part of the problem.

“This radical departure is one that threatens to make true religious liberty vulnerable, conditional, and limited,” Shackelford and Perkins said. “As some have said, it is a freedom ‘only with four walls.’ That is, you are free to worship within the four walls of your home, church, or synagogue, but when you enter the public square the message is, ‘leave your religion at home.’”

The Obama administration’s advocacy in an important case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in January likely is one of the more criticized of the incidents of hostility documented in the survey. The administration contended there is no “ministerial exception” that safeguards the rights of churches to hire and remove leaders without government regulation. The high court unanimously disagreed, saying such government involvement would infringe on both the First Amendment’s protection of religious free exercise and its ban on government establishment of religion. The ruling came in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Another Obama administration policy cited in the report is its abortion-contraceptive mandate, which requires all health insurance plans to cover contraceptives — even ones that can cause abortions — and has a religious exemption critics find woefully inadequate.

Among other instances of hostility cited in the report:
– The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at one point prohibited references to God in funerals at national cemeteries, a policy invalidated by a federal court.
– A Texas city barred citizens at a public senior adult center from praying before meals, singing Christian songs or listening to religious messages.
– Public school officials in Texas banned students from bringing gifts for classmates that referred to Jesus or contained other religious messages, actions that elicited censure by federal courts.
– A Texas city outlawed a Christian ministry to former prisoners from operating within its jurisdiction, an action rejected by the state’s Supreme Court.
– A federal appeals court ruled that prayers before local government meetings violate the establishment clause.

The report calls for advocacy on behalf of religious freedom.

“As dark as this survey is, there is much light,” the report says. “The secularist agenda only advances when those who love liberty are apathetic.”

Liberty Institute developed the 2004 report after Shackelford and others testified to a U.S. Senate committee about hostility toward religion. Senators asked LI to compile more information after critics charged the incidents were islated.

The report may be accessed online at http://www.religioushostility.org/.

–30–

Tom Strode is the Washington bureau chief for Baptist Press.

Yet Another Liberal Uses Twitter to Expose Soft Underbelly of Hatred

Actress Ellen Barkin created a stir on Twitter today when she sent out a re-tweet of a message someone sent saying they hoped Hurricane Isaac would hit the Republican convention and “was every pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist SOB right into the ocean.”

This comment aptly sums up my thoughts:
“It is no surprise to me that the pro-abortion side would have things like this to say about other human persons, they already stand for the slaughter of innocent people inside the womb why not expand that slaughter to outside the womb?” Kemper added. “We have a President who cannot even acknowledge that a baby outside the womb is a human child, why should we expect any different from his supporters in Hollywood. Can you imagine the media uproar if Rush Limbaugh has tweeted this? Can you imagine how crazy Rachel Maddow would be going if any conservative or pro-lifer publicly called for a hurricane to kill people?”
Ms. Barkin seems to be on the edge over a lot of things these days and has failed to learn what many “stars” have discovered when using Twitter to vent.  Those tweets reveal the soft underbelly of their hatred of anyone who disagrees with their liberal agenda.
“Shame on u @kslcom not airing @NBCTheNewNormal So L&O SVU (rape &child murder) is ok? But loving gay couple having a baby is inappropriate?,” Barkin tweeted Friday. “Anyone in Utah interested in @NBCTheNewNormal please clog up @ksl5tv feed 4 their blatantly homophic decision 2 not air the show #KSLBigots,” she later added.
On the bright side—the more the lefties expose their true nature and thoughts, the faster the masses will realize that their push for the normalization of any sexual preference is as contrary to God’s laws as the abortion of an innocent child.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if that television station received an outpouring of support

Islamophobic Hysteria Becomes Conventional Wisdom

Some few readers might wonder why I’ve categorized this excellent article about Islam and its goals under both our “foreign policy” and TEC “dioceses” categories.  But the excerpt below reveals all, I suspect, to most readers.
My book was well received by the public and generously reviewed by some of the conservative press. In what passes for the “mainstream” media, however, it was mostly ignored and otherwise panned as Islamophobic hysteria. This was because the book had two themes that were deeply unpopular:
1. Islamic supremacism is not a fringe ideology, but instead an entirely mainstream interpretation of Islam that is followed by hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide — the dominant Islam of the Middle East, and — whether a majority or a strong plurality — the dynamic Islam in the rest of the world today, including the West. Its chief proponents are the Saudi kingdom and the Muslim Brotherhood (Iran and its satellites compete with a Shiite version that is equally revolutionary, but there are vastly more Sunnis than Shiites). The Brotherhood rightly perceives itself as the intellectual vanguard of a global Islamic mass-movement with a ground-up strategy for Islamizing societies that prioritizes the implementation of sharia.
2. Islamists and Leftists are frequent collaborators. Though their disagreements are several and not trivial (e.g., women’s rights, gay rights, abortion), they are in harmony on basic, big-picture matters. Both ideologies are totalitarian in the sense of wanting centralized control of people’s lives, down to the small details; both elevate the good of the collective (or the ummah) over the individual; both are vigorously anti-capitalist (something most Americans still do not know about Islamist ideology); and neither can succeed in achieving its grand design without suppressing the liberties and self-determinism of the citizen.
On point 2, some objected to my use of the word sabotage in the subtitle. The word is not something I came up with, though. I was quoting an internal Muslim Brotherhood memorandum which described the Islamist mission in America as “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within” by means of “sabotage” (to be precise, by “sabotaging” the “miserable house” that is “Western civilization”).
This concept of pretending one’s intentions are benign in order to bore into a society’s institutions and fundamentally to transform them from within mirrors the Alinsky-style community organizing favored by the hard Left. Given that Islamists admit (at least among themselves) that they are committing sabotage, and given their propensity to make common cause with Leftists who employ the same transform-from-within strategy, I do not think there is much merit in this objection to the word sabotage. Put a different way, I think the real objection is that I spotlighted something they would rather keep hidden.
In any event, informed by these themes, I’ve been arguing for almost two years that the so-called Arab Spring, far from an outbreak of democracy, is actually the ascendancy of a new form of authoritarianism: namely, Islamic supremacism. It is more totalitarian than the dictatorships it is replacing. The Middle East uprisings feature democracy only cosmetically: there is the adoption of some procedures — mainly elections and constitution writing — that are used in democratic societies (as well as in non-democratic societies). There is no democratic culture, nor any realistic near-term prospect of it. As the “Arab Spring” plays out, “democracy” is just a means of getting Islamists into power. Once in charge, they are certain to adopt policies rooted in classical sharia and supremacist Islam’s totalitarian nature. The results will be the very opposite of democracy.

R.A. Dickey—Worship on the mound

In your recently published autobiography, Wherever I Wind Up, you're explicit about how God saved and changed your life. Journalists have interviewed you a lot over the past several months. What percentage of the interviewers have asked about your Christian faith? Probably 15 to 20 percent.

The subject didn't come up in your NPR interview. I brought it up. They edited it out. I always look for opportunities to talk about my faith in a way that is congruent with the story or the question that they ask, because it is important to me that people know. Most of the time it will be edited out.

Your description of the knuckleball—"The pitch has a mind of its own. You either embrace it for what it is—a pitch that is reliant on an amalgam of forces both seen and unseen—or you allow it to drive you half out of your mind"—seems like a metaphor for the mysteries of God's providence in the Christian life. To a certain extent it is, at least for me. An element of surrender has enabled me to get to the next place with the knuckleball. An element of surrender in my own life has helped me get to the next place in my faith and relationship to Christ. I didn't necessarily draw the parallel intentionally, but as a Christian there were so many times in my life where I wanted to control things and I would hold on to them so tightly that God couldn't get anywhere near them—or so I thought.

Read it all.

Why the Sexual Revolution Needed a Sexual Revolutionary

Why the Sexual Revolution Needed a Sexual Revolutionary
Helen Gurley Brown's influence on American culture shows how important individuals are in affecting major moral changes

By R. Albert Mohler, Jr.
THE ATLANTIC MAGAZINE
http://www.theatlantic.com/
Aug. 23, 2012

How do you turn the world upside down? In the span of just five decades, the moral and cultural world has been transformed by the sexual revolution. In terms of both public and private impact, no moral revolution can come close to the importance of the sexual revolution, and none has occurred so quickly. The moral world taken for granted in 1960 has virtually disappeared.

Helen Gurley Brown, who died last week at age 90, was one of the most important, if often underestimated, agents of that revolution.

Moral revolutions do not happen by accident, nor are they orchestrated by a cabal of cultural conspirators. As Kwame Anthony Appiah of Princeton University argued in his 2010 book, The Honor Code, moral revolutions do not emerge instantaneously. In most cases, the basic ideas and claims to knowledge lay dormant for some time. In looking at moral shifts including the end of dueling and the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade, Appiah notes that "a moral revolution has to involve a rapid transformation in moral behavior, not just in moral sentiments."

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org