Friday, May 31, 2013

Anybody here remember Anglicans Online?

They're still online, but they're not faring well.

VirtueOnline  Alexa Traffic Rank: 376,274 United States Flag Traffic Rank in US: 93,461
Stand Firm     Alexa Traffic Rank: 513,993 United States Flag Traffic Rank in US: 140,500
TitusOneNine Alexa Traffic Rank: 916,410 United States Flag Traffic Rank in US: 389,820


Anglicans Online  Global rank: 804,167  U.S Rank 253,616

Doing better than T19, but otherwise not doing too well.  

No Truth Without Love, No Love Without Truth: The Church’s Great Challenge

 
161063333The church’s engagement with the culture involves a host of issues, controversies, and decisions–but no issue defines our current cultural crisis as clearly as homosexuality. Some churches and denominations have capitulated to the demands of the homosexual rights movement, and now accept homosexuality as a fully valid lifestyle.
Other denominations are tottering on the brink, and without a massive conservative resistance, they are almost certain to abandon biblical truth and bless what the Bible condemns. Within a few short years, a major dividing line has become evident–with those churches endorsing homosexuality on one side, and those stubbornly resisting the cultural tide on the other.
The homosexual rights movement understands that the evangelical church is one of the last resistance movements committed to a biblical morality. Because of this, the movement has adopted a strategy of isolating Christian opposition, and forcing change through political action and cultural pressure.
Can we count on evangelicals to remain steadfastly biblical on this issue? Not hardly. Scientific surveys and informal observation reveal that we have experienced a significant loss of conviction among youth and young adults. No moral revolution can succeed without shaping and changing the minds of young people and children.
Inevitably, the schools have become crucial battlegrounds for the culture war. The Christian worldview has been undermined by pervasive curricula that teach moral relativism, reduce moral commandments to personal values, and promote homosexuality as a legitimate and attractive lifestyle option.
Our churches must teach the basics of biblical morality to Christians who will otherwise never know that the Bible prescribes a model for sexual relationships. Young people must be told the truth about homosexuality–and taught to esteem marriage as God’s intention for human sexual relatedness.
The times demand Christian courage. These days, courage means that preachers and Christian leaders must set an agenda for biblical confrontation, and not shrink from dealing with the full range of issues related to homosexuality. We must talk about what the Bible teaches about gender–what it means to be a man or a woman. We must talk about God’s gift of sex and the covenant of marriage. And we must talk honestly about what homosexuality is, and why God has condemned this sin as an abomination in His sight.
Courage is far too rare in many Christian circles. This explains the surrender of so many denominations, seminaries, and churches to the homosexual agenda. But no surrender on this issue would have been possible, if the authority of Scripture had not already been undermined. And yet, even as courage is required, the times call for another Christian virtue as well–compassion.
The tragic fact is that every congregation is almost certain to include persons struggling with homosexual desire or even involved in homosexual acts. Outside the walls of the church, homosexuals are waiting to see if the Christian church has anything more to say, after we declare that homosexuality is a sin. Liberal churches have redefined compassion to mean that the church changes its message to meet modern demands.
They argue that to tell a homosexual he is a sinner is uncompassionate and intolerant. This is like arguing that a physician is intolerant because he tells a patient she has cancer. But, in the culture of political correctness, this argument holds a powerful attraction. Biblical Christians know that compassion requires telling the truth, and refusing to call sin something sinless. To hide or deny the sinfulness of sin is to lie, and there is no compassion in such a deadly deception.
True compassion demands speaking the truth in love–and there is the problem. Far too often, our courage is more evident than our compassion. In far too many cases, the options seem reduced to these–liberal churches preaching love without truth, and conservative churches preaching truth without love.
Evangelical Christians must ask ourselves some very hard questions, but the hardest may be this: Why is it that we have been so ineffective in reaching persons trapped in this particular pattern of sin? The Gospel is for sinners–and for homosexual sinners just as much as for heterosexual sinners. As Paul explained to the Corinthian church, “Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God” [1 Corinthians 5:11].
I believe that we are failing the test of compassion. If the first requirement of compassion is that we tell the truth, the second requirement must surely be that we reach out to homosexuals with the Gospel. This means that we must develop caring ministries to make that concern concrete, and learn how to help homosexuals escape the powerful bonds of that sin–even as we help others to escape their own bonds by grace.
If we are really a Gospel people; if we really love homosexuals as other sinners; then we must reach out to them with a sincerity that makes that love tangible. We have not even approached that requirement until we are ready to say to homosexuals, “We want you to know the fullness of God’s plan for you, to know the forgiveness of sins and the mercy of God, to receive the salvation that comes by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, to know the healing God works in sinners saved by grace, and to join us as fellow disciples of Jesus Christ, living out our obedience and growing in grace together.”
Such were some of you . . . The church is not a place where sinners are welcomed to remain in their sin. To the contrary, it is the Body of Christ, made up of sinners transformed by grace. Not one of us deserves to be accepted within the beloved. It is all of grace, and each one of us has come out of sin.
We sin if we call homosexuality something other than sin. We also sin if we act as if this sin cannot be forgiven. We cannot settle for truth without love nor love without truth. The Gospel settles the issue once and for all. This great moral crisis is a Gospel crisis.
The genuine Body of Christ will reveal itself by courageous compassion, and compassionate courage. We will see this realized only when men and women freed by God’s grace from bondage to homosexuality feel free to stand up in our churches and declare their testimony–and when we are ready to welcome them as fellow disciples. Millions of hurting people are waiting to see if we mean what we preach.
Source: albertmohler.com

FRIDAY, MAY 24, 2013

St Paul, A Slave Girl, the Holy Spirit, and the Presiding Bishop


The Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, the Most Revd Katharine Jefferts Schori, delivered a sermon on May 12, the Seventh Sunday of Easter, at All Saints Church in Steenrijk, CuraƧao, which is in the Episcopal Church's Diocese of Venezuela. The first reading for that day was from Acts 16, which recounts the experience Paul and Silas had in Philippi, where they cast out a demon from a fortune-telling slave girl, and were then imprisoned at the behest of her traffickers on account of the economic harm the exorcism had caused them. 

This sermon has slowly become a bit of "a thing" in cyberspace over the nearly two weeks since it was delivered. Here's why:
Paul is annoyed at the slave girl who keeps pursuing him, telling the world that he and his companions are slaves of God.  She is quite right.  She’s telling the same truth Paul and others claim for themselves. But Paul is annoyed, perhaps for being put in his place, and he responds by depriving her of her gift of spiritual awareness.  Paul can’t abide something he won’t see as beautiful or holy, so he tries to destroy it.  It gets him thrown in prison.  That’s pretty much where he’s put himself by his own refusal to recognize that she, too, shares in God’s nature, just as much as he does – maybe more so! 
Criticism has been fierce, beginning with all but one of the comments on the ENS website posting of the text.

This is awkward. Because of my position in the system, Bishop Jefferts Schori is not an abstraction to me. She is someone from whom I have sat across a table in several meetings of the House of Bishops. She is someone who sends me a hand-written note on my birthday and the anniversary of my consecration. She is someone who very kindly checked in on me by email while I was recovering from heart surgery, for which I was immensely grateful.

Yet, I feel constrained by the vows I took when I was ordained a bishop--vows that she herself formally required of me--to "guard the faith, unity, and discipline of the Church of God." These vows do not permit me to remain silent, even as I also remain respectful and charitable. And precisely because the Presiding Bishop is a real person to me, someone I will have to once again look in the eye several weeks from now, I'm not saying anythingabout her that I would not say to her; in fact, I will be sending her a link to this blog post as soon as it's up.

To call Bishop Jefferts Schori's exegesis of Acts 16 "strained" or "eccentric" is too mild. It is utterly bizarre. But others have done an adequate job fisking the sermon. I'm going to cut right to what seems to me a rather larger and more fundamental issue, which is the duty of all Christians, but particularly those in ordained leadership, to operate from withinthe tradition, as an insider looking out, and not from a critical distance, as an outsider looking in. The Christian tradition (a term I use in what I think is an Eastern Orthodox sense, inclusive of scripture, liturgy, ascesis, and the mainstream of theology) is certainly an appropriate object of critical inquiry by detached outsiders, whether sympathetic or hostile. But such critical inquiry is not in the remit of a bishop; in fact, bishops pretty much surrender the option of engaging in that sort of work the moment they are consecrated. A bishop is, by definition, by job description, thoroughly a conservative, operating as a custodian of the tradition and articulating an insider's point of view. Is there room on the margins for prophetic voices that challenge the establishment, speaking words of truth and justice? Yes, there certainly is room for those voices. But they are not the voices of bishops. It is, rather, the job of bishops, speaking as consummate insiders, to equip the baptized faithful to listen to the voices from the margins and discern between true prophets and false ones.

As an insider looking out, as an apologist and cheerleader for the establishment, a bishop sits under the authority of the tradition, particularly the authority of sacred scripture. There are interpretive roads that are open to others--outsiders looking in--that are properly closed to bishops (and, by extension, to priests and others who preach and teach). In Acts 16, the author (presumably Luke) portrays Paul and Silas as the good guys, the slave girl as the exploited victim, and her "owners," along with the demon that possessed her, as the bad guys. What Paul did, operating in the power of the Holy Spirit, was to liberate an oppressed person. There is a homiletical treasure trove available here without disturbing this essential dynamic. To stray outside it only tortures the text. And I suspect that Bishop Katharine's concern that we recognize the image of God in one another could have been well-supported by the readings for Easter VII without so straying.

One of the great temptations for either a theologian or a pastor is to be original. It's a tonic to the ego. Under the right circumstances, a theologian can get away with it. St Paul certainly did! A pastor, by contrast, eschews originality. A pastor, a bishop, is a relay runner, handing along (para-dosis, the root of "tradition") the baton to the next runner, the next generation. Originality is not compatible with that job description.






   

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism     
Robert Lundy  
By Robert Lundy
Communications Officer
American Anglican Council

The other day I posted on the American Anglican Council's Facebook page the definition of Moralistic Therapeutic Deism and was surprised by the number of people who reused that information and shared it on their own Facebook profile. Now the AAC's social media pull is not the same as a Lady Gaga or a Justin Bieber (even if their stock is inflated). However, 20 "shares" and multiple comments, some negative, were enough to make me think the topic struck a nerve and would be good for further discussion.
So...what in the world is Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD)? When I first heard the term I thought it was something I was supposed to have read years ago in Philosophy 1000 at the University of Georgia.
The term comes from the book Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers (2005) by sociologists Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton and describes the sort of working theology that many young Americans have:

1. A god exists who created and ordered the world and watches over human life on earth.
2. God wants people to be good, nice, and fair to each other, as taught in the Bible and by most world religions.
3. The central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself.
4. God does not need to be particularly involved in one's life except when God is needed to resolve a problem.
5. Good people go to heaven when they die.
Before I attempt to dive in to this, please take a look at what someone with more experience has to say about it. Canon David Charney is the youth minister at Christ Church, Atlanta, GA, and he addressed this topic during one of our Sure Foundation seminars:

After I realized that Moralistic Therapeutic Deism wasn't something I missed in philosophy class, my next thought was that it did describe the theology of some Christians I knew and, given the increasing difficulty of distinguishing those who claim to be Christian from those who don't, it seemed that MTD might have hit the nail on the head in pointing out a major challenge for Christianity in the West...

Read the entire article here.
Source: American Anglican Council
   

Permalink
In 1999, Rosaria Champagne Butterfield was a tenured English professor at Syracuse University, a skeptic of all things Christianity, and in a committed lesbian relationship. Her academic specialty was Queer Theory, a postmodern form of gay and lesbian studies.
Today Butterfield is a mother of four, a homemaker, and wife of a Presbyterian pastor named Kent. They live in Durham, North Carolina.
She is an unlikely convert. And in this episode of the Authors on the Linepodcast, Butterfield shares the story of her conversion from a radical lesbian to a redeemed Christian. It's a story involving a pastor, a pretty ordinary local church, and a Bible.
“I tried to toss the Bible and all of its teachings in the trash — I really tried,” she says. “But I kept reading it, reading it not just for pleasure, but reading it because I was engaged in a research program trying to refute the religious right from a lesbian feminist perspective. . . . After my second or third, maybe fourth, pass through the entire Bible something started to happen. The Bible got to be bigger inside me than I. And it absolutely overflowed into my world. I really fought against it. And then one Sunday morning, no different from any other Sunday morning, I rose from the bed of my lesbian lover, and an hour later I sat in a church pew. I went there very conspicuous of the fact that I didn’t fit in. But I really had to confront this God.”
And she did.
In embracing the biblical Jesus, she found herself “a single ex-lesbian with a now defunct PhD,” the words she uses in her book The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert: An English Professor's Journey Into Christian Faith (26).
Her conversion landed her into “a complicated and comprehensive chaos” (27). “This was my conversion in a nutshell: I lost everything but the dog” (63).
But in return she found life in Christ.
In this 23-minute podcast, Butterfield shares more details about her unlikely conversion, and the personal challenges she faced in walking into a church building. She speaks to how relevant the Bible is to the needs, questions, and challenges that face a person in the gay and lesbian community.
To listen, you can subscribe to the Authors on the Line podcast in iTunes here. Download the mp3 here (21.8 MB). Or listen from the resource page through the following link:
Source: Desiring God

Have You Been Googled While You Preach?

Bob Hostetler more from this author »

DesperatePastor.com


Date Published:
 5/31/2013
It's a new day for preachers: make a claim from the pulpit and people will fact-check you before your message is over.
I had a short conversation with a friend and Christian brother recently that impressed on me how the stakes—the demands—have become higher in this age of smart phones, iPads, and Google. He told me of his pastor who made a strange and bold claim in a sermon.
My friend was doubtful, so right then and there he Googled the claim, and learned that it was extremely dubious, at best. He said he had since done the same with other statements, enough to really compromise the impact of his pastor's preaching ... and perhaps even his personal integrity. 
Now, probably every pastor in the world, including me of course, has failed at times in his or her research—especially since the dawn of the internet, perhaps. We can't know everything. We can't verify every source. We can only do so much. 
But we must keep in mind that almost anyone these days can do what my friend did. 
First, that's a challenge to remember that I need to be the first fact-checker of anything I say from the platform. I have always footnoted or otherwise indicated my sources when studying for and writing a sermon, which has often paid off when someone asked for the source or when, sometimes years later, I used it in an article or book. Even when for the sake of focus I've used phrases like, "I've heard it said" or "It has been reported" from the platform, I've made sure to have a citation available so anyone seeking more information could get it.
Second, I've always had as a goal to speak so compellingly throughout a message as to make it hard for a person to daydream or disengage, even for only a moment. It's a high standard, of course, but one that would these days make Googling my words a little tougher on the listener.
Finally, and most importantly in this new era of smart phones, I want to make sure that my words are always trustworthy, so that the person who does check their veracity would be reassured, as much as possible. I want my messages to build toward a response, and that goal is short-circuited if a listener begins to think, What did he just say? That can't be right!
By the time he or she goes to Google on a phone, I've probably lost not only that person's attention but also the likelihood of the kind of response I'd been praying for.

Bob Hostetler
Bob Hostetler is a writer, editor, and speaker from southeastern Ohio. His 30 books, which include "Quit Going to Church" and the novel, "The Bone Box," have sold over 3 million copies. He has coauthored a dozen books with Josh McDowell. Bob is a frequent speaker at churches, conferences, and retreats. He has been a disk jockey, pastor, magazine editor, freelance book editor, and, with his wife, Robin, a foster parent to 10 boys (though not all at once).
Source: sermoncentral.com

CHURCH IN IRAN CLOSED OVER REFUSAL TO STOP SERVICES IN FARSI

CHURCH IN IRAN CLOSED OVER REFUSAL TO STOP SERVICES IN FARSI

Barnabas Aid
May 28, 2013

A church in Iran that has refused to stop holding services in the national language, Farsi, has been closed following the arrest of one of its leaders.

The Central Assemblies of God (AoG) Church in Tehran was raided during a prayer meeting on 21 May. The Rev. Robert Aserian was detained and taken to an unknown location; the church building was searched, and books, documents and equipment seized.

Before going to the church, the security forces had raided the minister's home and confiscated items including his computer and books.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

What we can learn from the ex-gay porn star who reconnected with God

What we can learn from the ex-gay pornstar who reconnected with God
Jake Genesis is on a journey of reconciliation and redemption

By Francis Phillips
CATHOLIC HERLAD-UK
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/
May 29, 2013

The recent conversion of Jake Genesis, former "gay porn star" as he is described on several websites is a moving account of reconciliation and redemption. I had not heard of him until Terry Nelson, blogger at Abbey-Roads, mentioned him in a recent post.

"Gay porn star" is not a promising job description. That Genesis spent several months living that life only goes to show, as such stories do, that God's mercy is everywhere - indeed, perhaps alive and active more urgently in those who lead flamboyantly sinful lives. But Genesis also sounds a little unusual for the pornography industry; he has a philosophy degree and has served as a police officer for eight years. He is also a Catholic.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

We cannot abandon Syrian Christians

We cannot abandon Syrian Christians
Allies of al-Qaeda are purging the areas they control of "infidels". Why is the West ignoring this tragedy?

By Jim Wallace
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/we_cannot_abandon_syrian_christians
May 31, 2013

The hardest test of foreign policy is not its various intersections at the lofty geopolitical level, but where it inevitably impacts ordinary people.

For policy makers this is a very difficult place to reach. Even official visits to get the feel on the ground quickly become carefully choreographed events by sponsors determined to give an experience which supports their own agendas. And nowhere is this more the case than in the Middle East.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Anglican Communion News Service - Digest News


Anglicans in Africa stand up for children

By Bellah Zulu, ACNS 

Anglicans from across Africa this week joined governments, civil society and other Christians on the continent to commemorate Child Protection Week.

Child Protection Week, 27 May to 2 June, is an annual event when many countries raise awareness of children's rights, and to mobilise all sectors of society to ensure the care and protection of all children. 

Children worldwide face many forms of abuse and are often denied basic rights including an education, protection from harm, and access to basic healthcare. 

In parts of Africa, for example, children can miss out on schooling when they are forced instead to work during the farming season. 

Early Childhood Project Manager for the Diocese of Northern Zambia, Mrs Jellow Tembo said, "The farming season is the time when child labour is most rampant. Parents prefer to use their children as a source of cheap and readily available labour. Instead of going to school, children are used on farms to cultivate or even sent on the streets to sell merchandise." 

The problem of child labour is severe in Sub-Saharan Africa, where it is estimated that more than 40 percent of all children aged 5 to 14--approximately 48 million children-- labour for survival. 

The International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimates that agriculture is the largest employer of child labor in Africa. In a recent report, ILO cites "denying children education" as being one of the major negative impacts of child labour in Zambia, especially among children in rural areas. 

However, it also shows how employers, especially in the tobacco sector in Zambia, have collaborated with government and other stakeholders in a project trying to eliminate child labour. The project’s achievements includes the prevention and withdrawal of about 3,700 children from child labour against a target of 2,760 children. 

Other countries on the continent are also putting in place measures to try and curb child abuse. In Nigeria, to ensure child protection the Federal Government is establishing a child helpline to protect the rights of children. The project is meant to enable children in any kind of crisis to call a toll-free number to find help. 

Anglican Communion member Churches across Africa also make children, their welfare and involvement in church life, a priority. One example is the Anglican Church of Southern Africa that has included the "nurturing and protection of children and young people" among eight other strategic priority areas including public advocacy, women and gender. 

The Anglican Church of Kenya took centre stage last year when it called for investigations into an allegation that 30 orphaned children were mistreated at the Child Welfare Society of Kenya in Isiolo County. 

The various measures and efforts undertaken by Anglicans and indeed governments around Africa are a reflection of what Jesus teaches all Christians. The Indaba Reflections from the 2008 Lambeth Conference* capture this well: "Jesus called the children to himself, and in our time we must extend our charity to the children of the world. Sexual exploitation in its varied expressions must not be tolerated. 

"We wait for the day when child pornography and the commercial sexualisation of children come to an end. In God's kingdom no child will serve as a soldier, or slave, or labourer, but be set free from poverty, violence and their many manifestations." 

While the Church has been doing the best it can to ensure that children are safe, the role that parents themselves play in this regard is crucial. Tony Lawrence, the Provincial Youth Co-ordinator for the Anglican Youth of Southern Africa emphasised: "It is essential for parents to provide the first line of protection." 

He added, "[However], our clergy should be teaching Biblical Parenting and this is one of the areas greatly neglected in the church. A few sessions of preparing for baptism is not enough and parents need regular teaching and encouragement if they are going to be able to train the child in the way he must go." 

Mr Lawrence also outlined some of the initiatives that they are taking at provincial level to address issues of youths and children. He said, "We have recently launched a project called Project2013 which will develop an outcomes-based framework and curriculum for the spiritual development of all children and young people, and will include not only the theology of our faith but also how children need to relate to the environment around them, including what they can do as personal protection." 

Tony added, "It is the first steps to a broader ministry delivery, but we thought by dealing with the "heart" issues first and defining the minimum spiritual foundation intervention, we would have the platform on which to build into the future." 

A children co-ordinator from Kenya, Joshua Ongule thinks that parents should "understand the exodus of faith and nurture its journey to the end." He said, "The first step is to fill the child's mind with God's love at the first stage of faith by realising that younger children need to learn love, trust and forgiveness from their homes, churches, schools and the people around them. 

"Therefore parents have a massive duty to ensure that the institutional influencers are positive for things to work for God's glory. How can a child trust that the love talked about in John 3:16 exists if they don't experience that love at home, in Sunday school or anywhere?" 

Mrs Mary Malivas, is the Provincial Sunday school Co-ordinator for the Church of the Province of Central Africa as well as the Diocesan Sunday school Advisor for the Diocese of Northern Malawi. 

She challenged all parents on the continent to "lead by example" if they want their children to grow in Christ and become responsible members of the Church. 

"Parents should never fight or smoke while their kids are watching," she said. "You do this kind of stuff and expect children not to imitate? Children should be well taught and it does not matter how old they are. They should be brought up to know and love God." 

She explained that, at a minimum, the Church in Malawi encourages children to get involved with the life of the Church by singing in the choir. She added, "We also make sure that their teachers are sensitised on how to protect children against child abuse." 

Indeed, as Mr Ongule explains, it is vital for the Church to also tackle issues that exacerbate child abuse, neglect and exploitation in Africa, especially poverty. 

"The church in Africa should research on child poverty, its symptoms and manifestation," he said, "and then adopt ways in which the Church and the government can join hands to implement policies, program projects and activities aimed at making child protection effective." 

ENDS

Peter Ould responds to the Bishop of Salisbury—Nick Holtam’s Case for Polygamy

The ultimate irony of this line of argument (“stable, faithful, adult, loving” – SFAL) is that it’s proponents blatantly do not believe what they say. If Nick Holtam really thought that all that was needed for marriage was stability, faithfulness, adults and love, then he would have to support such polygamous relationships, let alone familial sexual relationships which meet the same criteria. But in actuality, Bishop Nick would probably happily say he doesn’t support such marriages.

Read it all.

Thursday, May 30, 2013


What Makes You Passionate for Jesus? - Bill Love

What Makes You Passionate for Jesus?

By Bill Love
Special to Virtueonline
www.virtueonline.org
May 30, 2013

If someone asked, "What makes you passionate for Jesus," what would you say? Recently, I was asked that very question. In search for an answer, I found myself recalling those special "holy mountain top" experiences in my life where I could sense God's presence; as well as some "dark night of the soul" moments when I felt all alone and wasn't sure what to believe or what direction to go. Each, ultimately have brought me closer to the Lord and have helped make me all the more passionate for Him.

As a "cradle Episcopalian" God and the Church have been an important part of my life for as long as I can remember. When I was about five, I asked a visiting priest if I could help him carry things in from his car for the service. He handed me his Bible to carry. To this day, I remember how proud and special I felt carrying the Bible. At that time I couldn't tell you much about the Bible other than that it was holy.

My love for the Lord and His Church really began to grow when we moved to East Texas and started attending St. Dunstan's Episcopal Church in Mineola. Fr. Ralph Woods took me under his wing, let me serve as an acolyte, taught, encouraged and inspired me. He was the one who first planted the seeds about becoming a priest. Jokingly he would say, "When you become a bishop..." Little did either of us know what the future held. I first sensed a possible call to the priesthood when I was in High School, but believed it was too limiting. Instead, I dreamed of becoming a great journalist, thinking that if I could learn to write, I would be able to touch on a number of different important topics and help change the world. Although I majored in journalism, I would later discover the life of a journalist was not what God had planned.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Episcopal Church Leaders Support Boy Scout Decision. Presiding Bishop Silent

Episcopal Church Leaders Support Boy Scout Decision. Presiding Bishop Silent
Boy Scouts Betrayed their Oath say conservative groups and parents
New Boy Scout Movements are being formed


News Analysis

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
May 30, 2013

The moral capitulation by the Boy Scout Association apparently does not warrant a statement of support from The Episcopal Church's Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori even though the 73rd General Convention passed resolution C031 in 2000 encouraging the Boy Scouts of America to allow membership to youth and adult leaders irrespective of their sexual orientation. An inquiry to a TEC News staffer as to whether the PB would put out a statement on the Boy Scouts decision to allow openly gay youths to be scouts was met with a curt "no."

Perhaps mindful that hundreds of thousands of aging Episcopalians grew up and were active members in the Boy Scouts with many still retaining conservative values, top leadership of TEC chose silence on the BSA decision. For the vast majority of Episcopal parishes across the nation will never see or vote for a gay priest, let alone see a gay bishop, the BSA decision hits closer to home. Positive support by the Presiding Bishop for the BSA would clearly have backfired against her and TEC, a risk she was not prepared to take.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Episcopalians and America - Jan Mahood

Episcopalians and America

By Jan Mahood
www.etf1928.org
Trinity 2013

The Episcopal Church has been an integral part of our nation since its founding. It was there at the creation.

When the colonists declared their independence from England, Anglicans separated from the mother country's Church as well, because Church of England clergy were required to swear allegiance to the monarch.

Although revisionists are fond of saying that the Founding Fathers were not practicing Christians, the opposite is true. In fact, 31 of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence - more than half -- were Episcopalians. Fourteen of the 48 signers of the Articles of Confederation were Episcopalians. Twenty-one Episcopalians - 54 percent. - were among the 39 signers of the U.S. Constitution. George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, first secretary of the U.S. Treasury, were three of them.

Read the full story at www.VirtueOnline.org

Joyce Meyer, Augustinian?

I read this headline, “Joyce Meyers, Augustinian” from Christopher Wells at the Living Church and I thought it was a joke. Unfortunately, it isn’t. I’ve met Christopher Wells before. He’s a smart guy. But he seems to be among those many moderate orthodox leaders in the Anglican world who believe the best way to heal Christian disunity is by accentuating the positives of various heterodox teachers in an effort to find “common ground”; the kind of thinking that led many to embrace Bishop Shannon Johnston as a brother in Christ and a devotee of the Nicene creed despite his gospel-denying teachings on human sexuality. So Joyce Meyers, Word of Faith,Prosperity Gospel teacher, is now, according to Mr Wells, “Joyce Meyers, Augustinian”. It is not as if information about Joyce Meyer’s is lacking. Mr Wells was able to research and identify some problematic aspects of her personal life in the article, but he passes over completely the gospel denying aspects of her ministry. The closest he comes to suggesting that some of her teachings might not be kosher is this section from his penultimate paragraph:
“Is this the fullness of Christian truth? Probably not. I’d like to see more about the continuity — apostolicity — of the Church down the ages; a deeper wrestling with the people of God in Scripture, ordered around God’s faithfulness to Israel; more about the Church’s worship.”
She’s almost there. It’s not that she actively denies biblical truth - she just doesn’t give us the “fullness of it”. This is a woman who believes we have the power to speak things into existence, that faith is an actual ‘power’ like the force in Star Wars; that positive words are like magical incantations that force God’s hand; that God wants you to be healthy and wealthy and if you are not healthy and wealthy you just don’t have enough faith power. This is a woman who claims that she no longer commits sin; that Jesus did not finish his work of atonement on the cross, but instead while being tortured in Hell; that if you believe that Jesus completed his atoning work on the cross you cannot be saved; that Jesus ceased to be the Son of God when he became sin for us. This is not Augustinianism. This is not an “almost there” Christianity that just needs a little Apostolic Succession mixed in. This is a false gospel altogether.

I understand that there are many in the orthodox world Anglican world who fear more than anything else being associated with those mean-spirited zealots (probably Calvinists) who draw firm un-reconciling lines rather than gathering in conversational ovals but this tack of finding common ground, accentuating the positives of heretics, plays right into their hands. Heretics mix truth with falsehood. That’s how they lead people away from Christ.
They come in sheep’s clothing but mouth the words of the Shepherd. They come dressed as angels of light but deal in doctrines from the Pit. Accentuating the positive only contributes to their ploy and makes it that much more likely that people will buy into their lies. Why would a good Anglican journal help in this process?