First, if liberals are upset about this move and are calling it divisive, aren't they the same folks who have not been willing to call the actions of pecusa since 2003 divisive. Is it not disingenuous to call the Pope's action divisive and not be willing to recognize the obviously divisive nature of pecusa actions.
Second, wouldn't it be laughable as in really funny if the PB of pecusa issued a statement like our African brothers that indicated that the Pope's action would have little effect on pecusa since pecusa is strongly grounded in theology? That would not only be laughable, it would be ludicrous, which is why no such statement can be expected.
No comments:
Post a Comment