When you don't have the gospel all kinds of other issues will fill the vacuum.
Friday, September 24, 2010
pecusa liberals and Fr. Don Armstrong
The recent post from The Lead that is below is just part of the drumbeat from the Episcopal Fraud about Fr. Don Armstrong. The post below even provides a link to the ACNA disciplinary canons. An objective observer might wonder why members of TEF would be interested in the disciplinary canons of the orthodox province in North America. That objective observer might also notice the litigious nature of TEF and surmise that lawsuits are what TEF is most interested in.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
An objective observer might also wonder why some 'orthodox' are quick to shout 'theft' at TEC, but seem strangely forgiving when one of their own has been caught (by civil authoritities) with his hand in the cookie jar.
Even Stand Firm have little sympathy for Fr Armstrong. What does that say?
Orthodox are quick to shout theft at the Episcopal Fraud because the properties that TEF sues to control were bought and paid for by the people in the pews and not TEF.
If Fr. Armstrong stole money then why is there a settlement? Is it because the monies used by Fr. Armstrong were authorized by the vestry?
As for the motives of SFIF, I don't have a clue, but I can say as you can as well if you've spent any time on their blog, they don't always get it right.
Anon, just so you know, my rights to comment at SFIF were pulled by Greg Griffith when I commented that Griffith was saying things about David Virtue that he would never permit anyone to say about himself on SFIF.
Post a Comment