A UNITER, NOT A DIVIDER
Roman Catholics? Once again, you’re welcome. Pennsylvania Episcopal BishopCharles Bennison pulls away from the field in this year’s Most Vile Pointy Hat competition:
I sincerely appreciate the prayers of my peers in the House of Bishops
Right about now, I’m pretty sure that most, if not all, of them would prefer that you didn’t mention that, Chuckles.
and understand that they are concerned for the welfare of my soul.
They’re probably way more concerned with the witness of their church but to-may-to, to-mah-to.
However, they have no cause to be worried.
Unless any of them have young children or know somebody who does.
I am, and have always been, innocent of the charges against me. And now the Court of Review of the Episcopal Church has reversed the erroneous decision of the Trial Court, and I have been restored to my position as Bishop of Pennsylvania.
Free to find the real bishop who covered up my brother’s perversions.
As the Court of Review clearly determined from its review of the facts, I was unaware of my younger brother’s inappropriate relationship
“Inappropriate relationship?” Try statutory rape, Chuck.
with a minor member of our church until late 1977, after the relationship was over, and the young woman was legally an adult.
In a lengthy judicial process Bishop Bennison was found guilty on two counts of conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy during a lengthy judicial process. Subsequently, the Court of Review reversed one count, upheld one count, but vacated the sentence because the statute of limitations had expired. We respect the decision of the Court of Review and we share their disappointment and find the ultimate resolution of this matter unsatisfactory and morally repugnant.
The bishops go on to quote from the Court of Review:
The tragedy of this conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy is exacerbated by the fact that, during the trial of the case, Appellant testified that, upon reflection on his failure to act, he concludes that his actions were “just about right.” They were not just about right. They were totally wrong. Appellant’s testimony on this subject revealed impaired judgment with regard to the conduct that is the subject of the First Offence and that is clearly and unequivocally conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy.
As well as the appeals court:
…we find that Appellant committed conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy. Because the statute of limitations has run on that offense, we have no choice under the canons of the Church but to reverse the judgment of the Trial Court finding that Appellant is guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy…
But back to Chuckles. Ever wanted to kick a bishop as hard as you possibly can right in le secteur génital? You will in about fifteen seconds.
No comments:
Post a Comment