Boy Scouts Lose Their Way
NYFRF Reacts to the Boy Scouts of America Policy Change
|
Rochester, NY - Earlier
today, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) voted to amend its membership policies
to allow open and avowed homosexual youth to participate in Scouting. Rev.
Jason J. McGuire, President of New Yorker's Family Research Foundation, made
the following comments:
"Today's vote marks the end of Scouting as we know
it. Years of litigation and other forms of pressure from pro-homosexual
individuals and groups have had their intended effect; they have led the BSA
to throw up its hands and yield. By giving in to the pressure to compromise
its position on homosexuality, the BSA has broken the Scout Law, which
requires bravery. Further, the BSA's action today has rendered meaningless
the provision of the Boy Scout Oath that requires Scouts to be 'morally
straight.'"
Rev. McGuire continued, "This policy change is wrong
on many levels. First, it is a 'solution' without a problem. The existing
policy on homosexuality reads as follows:
While
the BSA does not proactively inquire about the sexual orientation of employees,
volunteers, or members, we do not grant membership to individuals who are
open or avowed homosexuals or who engage in behavior that would become a
distraction to the mission of the BSA.
This policy is appropriate for an organization that helps
boys develop into strong, responsible, morally upright men who contribute to
American society. It does not exclude boys who struggle with unwanted
same-sex attractions. Rather, it presents boys with a clear and fair choice
between participating in Scouting and affirming a homosexual identity, and
leaves them free to decide between the two. The policy also gives parents a
clear assurance that traditional sexual morality will be upheld within
Scouting, and that their local Boy Scout troop will not be a sexualized environment
or a forum for the promotion of homosexuality."
"Second, the policy change is a clear effort to stake
out a middle ground on an issue where there is no middle ground. Either
homosexuality is 'morally straight" or it is not. There is no in-between.
While the leadership of the BSA may hope that today's accommodation will
assuage the demands of homosexual activists, its hope is vain; pressure from
those activists will continue, and they will not be satisfied until the BSA
and every other institution in American society jumps onto the pro-gay
bandwagon. Following today's vote, there really is no basis for the BSA not
to completely fold on the issue of homosexuality and allow open, active
homosexuals to participate in Scouting at all levels."
"Third, the new policy leaves many questions
unanswered. While the BSA asserts that the new policy will not allow
homosexually active boys to participate in Scouting, NYFRF does not believe
that this assertion is correct. While the resolution that was passed made it
clear that the BSA frowns on sexual behavior of any sort by boys, the policy
itself contains no prohibition on homosexual behavior. This omission could
result in the new policy being construed to allow homosexually active boys to
participate in Scouting."
"Fourth, there is an internal inconsistency in the
new policy-it will allow boys who identify as homosexual to participate in
Scouting, but will not allow men who identify as homosexual to participate in
the BSA as leaders. This inconsistency seems likely to result in further
litigation, and hands homosexual activists a strong argument that the BSA no
longer frowns upon homosexuality and, thus, should be compelled to allow
openly gay scoutmasters."
"Finally, the new policy will drive away churches,
families, and Scouts who believe in the timeless principles that the BSA used
to embrace. With great sadness, NYFRF calls upon those churches, families,
and Scouts to explore alternatives to the BSA that do not offend their moral
principles regarding homosexuality. Clearly, the Scouts have lost their
way."
###
New Yorker's Family Research Foundation (NYFRF) is a
non-profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
NYFRF believes that strong families mean a strong state. NYFRF educates
evangelical Christians and other socially conservative New Yorkers on issues
pertaining to the pro-family perspective in the Empire State.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment