What should we do when Christians disagree - really
By The Rev. Canon Phil Ashey
I am writing in response to an
article published today by the Anglican Communion's news office "What
should we do when Christians disagree?" by the Rev. Dr. Phil Groves,
facilitator of the Continuing Indaba Project. In the article, Grove writes that
when Christians disagree, "when disunity appears, facilitated
conversations are the Biblical way forwards."
With all due respect, his
analysis misses the mark by a longshot.
First, he cites the
disagreement between Euodia and Syntyche in Philippians 4:2-3 as the Biblical
paradigm for all disagreement within the Church. But what about differences
over Christian doctrine itself? In his landmark study Conciliarism: A History
of Decision making in the Church (Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 56-60)
Paul Valliere notes meticulously the doctrinal disagreements that gave rise to
the Councils of the Early Church. Disagreements over doctrine often present
themselves first as disciplinary issues-- such as how do you deal with the
"re-baptism" of people who vacillated or apostasized in the face of
persecution (Council of Carthage, 256 AD), or how do you respond to public
rites for the blessing of same-sex unions and the consecration as bishop of a
person living in such a union? (Anglican Communion, 2003).
Groves seems to have forgotten his history. The crisis in the
Anglican Communion since at least 2003 has been and continues to be over the
very definition of the Gospel...Read more.
No comments:
Post a Comment